Something to Think About

Continuing my current blog theme of random musings, I was reminded this morning of something that I read about in The Shaping of Things To Come that sparked my interest.

Having experienced the highs and lows of leadership in both a church and the monastic/mission order hybrid that is Cornerstone, I have formulated a few opinions on the structures of authority that we Christians tend to regard as normative. It goes without saying, of course, that my opinions have been shaped by my experiences as much as my theological reflection. In fact, my theological reflection will no doubt have been a response to my experiences. Anyway...

In The Shaping of Things to Come you'll come across a chapter entitled "The Genius of APEPT". In this chapter, a leadership structure is suggested that builds on the Apostle, Prophet, Evangelist, Pastor, Teacher gifts that Paul refers to in Ephesians 4. The suggestion is, putting it simply, that a church be led by a team consisting of individuals who are each gifted in one of these areas. In other words, a leadership team consists of one Apostle, one Prophet, one Evangelist, one Pastor and one Teacher.

There are various other things to consider, such as where does the buck really stop (every team needs a leader within it); what about individuals who are gifted in more than one area; what about churches where an individual with one of the giftings seems to be lacking; what is an Apostle anyway and so on. These are details that would need to be worked out, but as a principle I think it is sound - even more so if we understand the giftings (as Paul surely does in Ephesians 4) to be about equipping and enabling the congregation in these areas as well as 'doing' them. I think that a church or Christian group that had a leadership structure like this would be in a healthy place.

Many evangelical churches tend towards a structure that has one (or two or three) 'full-time elders' with a supporting cast of 'tent-maker elders'. It would be a rare church that could afford to support five 'full-time elders', each with one of the APEPT giftings. Of course, this presumes that church leadership should be done as a full-time profession. This need not be the case. at least not as we understand full-time ministry. I would not be surprised, for example, if an individual with the gifting of Evangelist or Pastor actually wanted to support themselves in the workplace as an expression of and opportunity for the outworking of their giftings.

In essence, all the APEPT method is is a recognition of the superiority of team-based leadership when each part of the team brings a different ability to the table. In reality, what makes this interesting is the use of Ephesians 4 to define what aspects a healthy leadership structure should contain.